Resources
Federal Resources
United States Constitution
United States Code
United States Supreme Court and Opinions
United States Supreme Court Blog
United States Department of Justice
Federal Trade Commission
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
United States Patent and Trademark Office
U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Articles and Papers
U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Manual
Antitrust Statutory Provisions
Antitrust Fines and Jail Sentences Imposed
U.S. DOJ View of Corporate Leniency in Cartel Enforcement
Antitrust Division Corporate Leniency Policy
Antitrust Division Individual Leniency Policy
Antitrust Division Explanation of Leniency Program
World Competition Database for COMP LAW, INS PROFILE or COMP PROFILE
California Resources
State of California Constitution
State of California Code
State of California Courts and Opinions
State of California Secretary of State Business Portal
State of California Department of Corporations
Bar Associations
American Bar Association
State Bar of California
New York State Bar Association
South Carolina Bar
Explanations of DOJ Leniency and Enforcement Policies by
Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Gary R. Spratling:
Key United States Supreme Court Antitrust Price Fixing Decisions:
- The Per Se Rule
N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 (1956) - Joint and several liability
Texas Indus. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc., 451 U.S. 630 (1981) - No pass-on defense in direct purchaser actions
Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968) - No standing for indirect purchasers
Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977) - State Illinois Brick "repealer" statutes not preempted by federal law
California v. ARC America Corp., 490 U.S. 93 (1989)